Before Watchman was published, I was skeptical and unhappy — all the publicity made it sound like nothing but a clever lawyer and a greedy publisher in cahoots to exploit an old woman. Now, having read the book, I glimpse a different tragedy. Lee was a young writer on a roll, with several novels in mind to write after this one. She wrote none of them. Silence, lifelong. I wonder if the reason she never wrote again was because she knew her terrifyingly successful novel was untrue. In taking the easy way, in letting wishful thinking corrupt honest perception, she lost the self-credibility she, an honest woman, needed in order to write. —Book View Cafe Blog
Congrats to all the winners at the Pittsburgh 48 Hour Film Project! Bit-Sized Productions ...
An English professor tries to help ChatGPT write and revise a sonnet
ChatBot Helps Crack the Case of the Missing 45GB
The internet’s memory is fading in front of us. Preserve what you can.
Students must learn how to get things wrong. Only one subject does that. [English.]
In October, 2002, I was blogging about stupid space explosions, the superiority complex, w...
4 thoughts on “Ursula K. Le Guin: A Personal Take on Go Set a Watchman”
Paul O’Brian liked this on Facebook.
Joanna Howard liked this on Facebook.
Jenny Fox Estok liked this on Facebook.
RT @DennisJerz: Ursula K. Le Guin: Before [Harper Lee’s] Watchman was published, I was skeptical and unhappy … http://t.co/AGZuD3hKFP