I don’t really want to assign a grade to this draft… I just want to sit down with the student and have a conversation about why the words “cannot” and “because” mean completely different things according to context.
“The ice cannot be melted because the temperature is below freezing” uses “cannot” as a physical impossibility and “because” to introduce a factual reason for the claim, but “The highway cannot be cancelled because one person objected to it” uses “cannot” as a moral imperative and “because” to explain the thing being rejected, not the reader’s rejection of the claim.
Simply giving a mark on the student’s paper doesn’t ensure the student understands why I asked him to consider the ambiguity of “cannot” and “because.”
Similar:
How to Disagree Academically: Using Graham's "Disagreement Hierarchy" to organize a colleg...
Seton Hill students Emily Vohs, Elizabeth Burns, Jake Carnahan-Curcio and Carolyn Jerz in ...
Dr. David von Schlichten honors the spectrum of motivations (not always financial) feature...
Journalist flexes in story about Trump Media accountant who has spelled his own name 14 di...
Surprise sidewalk encounter with my man Hopkins outside the Admin shuttle stop this mornin...
This is what the techbros are excited about? Really?