To summarize the findings: because they didn’t teach to the test, the professors who instilled the deepest learning in their students came out looking the worst in terms of student evaluations and initial exam performance. To me, these results were staggering, and I don’t say that lightly.
Bottom line? Student evaluations are of questionable value.
Teachers spend a lot of effort and time on making sure their lectures are polished and clear. That’s probably a good thing, if it inspires students to pay attention, come to class, and stay motivated. But it’s also important to keep the goal–learning–in sight. In fact, some argue that students need to fail a lot more if they want to learn. —Psychology Today.
Similar:
Close Reading of Sonnet 130: Form, Theme, and Cultural Context (and a Rage Comic)
I'm preparing to teach Shakespeare again...
Academia
Woodward dismisses CNN's lawsuit against the White House; Fox sides with CNN
Bob Woodward, half of the Washington Pos...
Culture
Bihar Boards: An annual ritual of cheating and chitting!
When Board examinations are due in Bihar...
Academia
In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit. @thepublicpgh
In a hole in the ground there lived a ho...
Books
An Hour of Monastic Silence in Media Studies Class (plus an awesome drum solo)
I announced that my 300-level Media and ...
Academia
Breakfast Battle from "The Miracle Worker" (Pamela Lee as Annie Sullivan and Carolyn Jerz ...
Update: Here's a clip of the whole break...
Culture




Elaine Vaudreuil liked this on Facebook.
Lou Recine Ofs liked this on Facebook.
RT @DennisJerz: Do the Best Professors Get the Worst Ratings? (Psychology Today) http://t.co/gi095lErZq
RT @DennisJerz: Do the Best Professors Get the Worst Ratings? (Psychology Today) http://t.co/gi095lErZq
Stacy Ann Vitt liked this on Facebook.