Before Watchman was published, I was skeptical and unhappy — all the publicity made it sound like nothing but a clever lawyer and a greedy publisher in cahoots to exploit an old woman. Now, having read the book, I glimpse a different tragedy. Lee was a young writer on a roll, with several novels in mind to write after this one. She wrote none of them. Silence, lifelong. I wonder if the reason she never wrote again was because she knew her terrifyingly successful novel was untrue. In taking the easy way, in letting wishful thinking corrupt honest perception, she lost the self-credibility she, an honest woman, needed in order to write. —Book View Cafe Blog
Similar:
Facebook’s push of “related articles” to users without checking credibility draws fire
The links under your friend's post got y...
Cyberculture
11 Compound Word Errors that Might Make You Look like a Numbskull
You might wonder why we flip out over ...
Culture
Google 1407
Philipp Lenssen and I had a bit of fun i...
Aesthetics
Yellow Journalism Did Not Cause the Spanish-American War (Role of Sensationalized Headlin...
When a correspondent sent to Cuba to c...
Aesthetics
As CRT Supplies Vanish the Classic Arcade Machine is Virtually Dead
If you understand the environment in whi...
Culture
Nicholas Winton, “Britain’s Schindler,” Dies at 106
Nicholas Winton, a British stockbroker w...
Culture




Paul O’Brian liked this on Facebook.
Joanna Howard liked this on Facebook.
Jenny Fox Estok liked this on Facebook.
RT @DennisJerz: Ursula K. Le Guin: Before [Harper Lee’s] Watchman was published, I was skeptical and unhappy … http://t.co/AGZuD3hKFP