It’s poor chemistry between writer and reader (pontificator and pontificatee, in the academic version), like lack of sizzle between jaded full professor and enthusiastic asst. prof. It’s failure of Interrogator A to make the noises and gestures that work for Hegemonized Reader B. It may be Defamiliarizer A’s clumsy attempt to shake up the ideological/emotional/instrumental reflexes of Overly Essentialized Reader B. It may be sheer incompetence at nouns, verbs, and adjectives. —Carlin Romano —Was It as Bad for You as It Was for Me? (Chronicle)
Another fine suggestion from Jim.
Similar:
Shakespeare’s Genius Is Nonsense
Just as comedians generally don't laugh ...
Culture
The real Lord of the Flies: what happened when six boys were shipwrecked for 15 months
“I have always understood the Nazis,” ...
Books
Email (finding the right tone as a writer)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXlgO...
Cyberculture
Exodus From an Elsevier Neuroscience Journal
One of the world’s largest scientific pu...
Academia
The cultural implications of the myth that English majors end up working permanently at St...
Would you like facts with that? English ...
Academia
Opinion: A deceptively edited video of Joe Biden signals what’s coming (Washington Post)
Critical thinking skills and basic textu...
Academia


