Now, as much as I love books, I love computers, too. Computers
are fundamentally different from modern books in the same way
that printed books are different from monastic Bibles: they are
malleable. Time was, a “book” was something produced by many
months’ labor by a scribe, usually a monk, on some kind of
durable and sexy substrate like foetal lambskin. [ILLUMINATED
BIBLE] Gutenberg’s xerox machine changed all that, changed a book
into something that could be simply run off a press in a few
minutes’ time, on substrate more suitable to ass-wiping than
exaltation in a place of honor in the cathedral. The Gutenberg
press meant that rather than owning one or two books, a member of
the ruling class could amass a library, and that rather than
picking only a few subjects from enshrinement in print, a huge
variety of subjects could be addressed on paper and handed from
person to person. —Cory Doctorow —E-Books: Neither E Nor Books (Craphound)
E-Books: Neither E Nor Books
What have my students learned about creative nonfiction writing? During class they are col...
There’s No Longer Any Doubt That Hollywood Writing Is Powering AI
I’ve been teaching with this handout for over 25 years, updating it regularly. I just remo...
In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit. @thepublicpgh
Despite its impressive output, generative AI doesn’t have a coherent understanding of the ...
My mother-in-law invited me to try out the 60- year-old tape machine that belonged to my f...
Thanks for this link, Dennis. This is one of the best arguments I’ve read about ebooks ever.