At the end of their most recent paper reporting these findings, the researchers reflect that it is “ironic, sublime and truly humbling” that this 4,500-year-old limestone is so true to the original that it has misled generations of Egyptologists and geologists and, “because the ancient Egyptians were the original-albeit unknowing-nanotechnologists.”
As if the scientific evidence isn’t enough, Barsoum has pointed out a number of common sense reasons why the pyramids were not likely constructed entirely of chiseled limestone blocks. —Sheila Berninger and Dorilona Rose —The Surprising Truth Behind the Construction of the Great Pyramids (Live Science)
Similar:
Is Breakfast Necessary?
The idea that early eating is essential ...
Business
'Fontgate': Microsoft, Wikipedia and the scandal threatening the Pakistani PM
I would call this "typefacegate," but th...
Culture
Frisbee is a brand name, but how newsworthy is that?
What would you do? Today I wrote 192 ...
Academia
Desiderata (Nerdy Inspiration)
This is a little story about an inspirat...
Culture
The Xplor Store: The Forgotten Carnegie Science Center Exhibit? (Guest Post by Leigh Jerz...
The other day, my wife suggested a Carne...
Books
At the Johnstown Flood Museum. (May 31 1889 the neglected dam at the South Fork Fishing an...
At the Johnstown Flood Museum. (May 31 1...
Culture


