On page 9 of a 13-page ruling, Judge Hernandez last month set out these requirements to qualify as a journalist:
- Education in journalism.
- Credentials or proof of affiliation with a recognized news entity
- Proof of adherence to journalistic standards such as editing, fact-checking, or disclosures of conflicts of interest
- Keeping notes of conversations and interviews conducted
- Mutual understanding or agreement of confidentiality between the defendant and his/her sources
- Creation of an independent product rather than assembling writings and postings of others
- Contacting “the other side” to get both sides of a story
‘Without evidence of this nature, defendant is not ‘media,” the ruling says. Obviously, the judge — an Obama appointee — doesn’t understand either media or the First Amendment. His ruling also went much farther than the case before him required. (Cox lost a $2.5 million verdict.) —You Be The Judge: Are Bloggers Journalists? – Forbes.
Similar:
The right — and surprisingly wrong — ways to get kids to sit still in class
When it came time for me to make sugge...
Culture
Russian trolls 'spreading discord' over vaccine safety online
The good news is that there are fewer Am...
Cyberculture
Partisan Pa. websites masquerading as local news threaten trust in journalism, new report ...
People with financial interests to prote...
Culture
My 10yo Created Bookmarks to Express Her Complex Relationship with Reading
My 10yo has a complex relationship with ...
Books
Simulated iceberg, preserved artifacts and re-creations at the Titanic installation.
...
Culture
Lessons from the Covington Catholic Flashpoint
My social media network includes people ...
Culture


