Finally getting around to blogging some notes about sessions I’ve attended. I don’t know if the overall quality of the conference has improved or if I just really know how to pick ’em, but all the sessions I’ve attended so far have been great. The first session I attended was “Evaluating Academic Weblogs: Using Empirical Data to Assess Pedagogy and Student Achievement.” — Clancy Ratliff —CCCC, Day 1, Session 1 (CultureCat)
Clancy Ratliff posted a generous and thoughful summary of the session I chaired. Rather than post my own notes, I thought I’d just link to hers. (I’ve got detailed notes from your session, Clancy… I’ll post them as soon as I get the chance.)
Similar:
Yesterday my stack of unmarked assignments was about 120, so this is not bad.
How to Disagree Academically: Using Graham's "Disagreement Hierarchy" to organize a colleg...
A.I. 'Completes' Keith Haring's Intentionally Unfinished Painting
Seton Hill students Emily Vohs, Elizabeth Burns, Jake Carnahan-Curcio and Carolyn Jerz in ...
Dr. David von Schlichten honors the spectrum of motivations (not always financial) feature...
This is what the techbros are excited about? Really?