It’s not surprising that marketers love IntelliTxt while many journalists despise it. AlwaysOn columnist Rafe Needleman called IntelliTxt “pretty bad news” from an ethics standpoint “because it blurs the line between editorial content, which readers should expect to be free of commercial influence, and advertising, which we know is paid-for and biased.” —Adam L. Penenberg —This Headline Is Not for Sale (Wired)
The “IntelliTxt” ad service inserts inline links into the body of a news article. I’d agree that this oversteps a line, potentially blurring what should be a pretty clear boundary between editorial content and paid advertising.
Similar:
Somewhere out there, somebody is working really hard to come up with a meme to blame this ...
Front page of the Miami Herald newspaper...
Business
The Bill That Could Save College Students $1,200 a Year
Faculty who need to publish for professi...
Academia
York Plays 2025: Five cameras, adding up to ~100 hours of footage.
Five cameras, adding up to ~100 hours of...
Academia
Remember That Class Assignment I Hated? The One That Landed Me My Dream Job?
ME (a couple years ago): Okay, students....
Academia
Covfefe chaos: What Trump’s typos say about his administration
Misspelled tweets and typos in press rel...
Culture
Just a random side corridor in the #neovictorian #steampunk cruiser I've been building in ...
Aesthetics
Chuck, I don’t think Intelltxt is something that’s downloaded on your computer so it affects every page you view, but I can imagine sneakware that does something like that.
Actually, I just read the article more carefully, and my situation was something different because I wasn’t creating the links. But this is certainly inappropraitely blurring a boundary between advertising and editorial content.
I *think* my office computer was hit by something like IntelliTxt. I’d go to my blog and certain keywords (a movie title, the word “travel”) were highlighted with links to a movie website or a travel agent website. Very annoying and frightening.