“The year 2000 marked a turning point, with the population’s ‘momentum’ becoming negative; there will be fewer parents in the next generation than in this one.”
This is a straightforward summary of an article to be published in Science. It might have been a more interesting article if it interviewed someone from one of the overpopulation scare groups. Let’s try a little experiment:
- Google hits on “overpopulation“: “about 121,000. Search took 0.05 seconds”.
- Google hits on “underpopulation“: “about 1,170. Search took 0.11 seconds”.
Hmm… why did it take Google take 100% longer to find 1% of the hits? Is it because the “underpopulation” websites are more obscure? Help me, Elwyn (who, I see, has now broadened his focus from Google in particular to “exercising personal power in the Information Age”).
Similar:
87,000 Missing Deaths: Tracking the True Toll of the Coronavirus Outbreak
Sobering report from the New York Times,...
Current_Events
Frazetta's "A Princess of Mars" painting sells for $1.2 million at auction
I've read about 11 of the Edger Rice Bur...
Aesthetics
Eats, Shoots & Leaves
What's your comma IQ? Mine just so happe...
Amusing
Planet of the Blind: Oprah, If Only You Had Read the Book!
I can’t wait for a TV network by and for...
Books
The Myth of the Fake Geek Girl
It's not surprising, then, that being a...
Culture
Finland is Winning the War on Fake News
This is story is from May, but it's very...
Culture


