“The year 2000 marked a turning point, with the population’s ‘momentum’ becoming negative; there will be fewer parents in the next generation than in this one.”
This is a straightforward summary of an article to be published in Science. It might have been a more interesting article if it interviewed someone from one of the overpopulation scare groups. Let’s try a little experiment:
- Google hits on “overpopulation“: “about 121,000. Search took 0.05 seconds”.
- Google hits on “underpopulation“: “about 1,170. Search took 0.11 seconds”.
Hmm… why did it take Google take 100% longer to find 1% of the hits? Is it because the “underpopulation” websites are more obscure? Help me, Elwyn (who, I see, has now broadened his focus from Google in particular to “exercising personal power in the Information Age”).
Similar:
ChatGPT Can't Kill Anything Worth Preserving
Many are wailing that this technology sp...
Academia
First time visiting the Point. Listening to Quantum's 10 for 21 (audio adaptation of the D...
My first time visiting the Point. Listen...
Culture
Mr. President, stop attacking the press
Reagan recognized that as leader of the ...
Culture
The Die Is Cast (#StarTrek #DS9 Rewatch, Season 3, Episode 21) Garak's mentor leads a pres...
Rewatching ST:DS9 After the recap of ...
Culture
Quick Study: Neuroscience: Crosswords don’t make you clever
Many people think classical music is goi...
Games
Huge Collection of Free CC-Licensed Textbooks (2012)
2012 Book Archive. Business, humaniti...
Academia


