“To be sure, writers and artists need and deserve continued copyright protection. But Eldred’s legions of backers maintain that the framers of our constitution never intended to extend that protection to the grandchildren of writers and artists. They add that it’s also pretty unlikely that struggling artists would decide not to create something today because their heirs 100 or more years in the future won’t be able to keep selling it. What’s really happened, they say, is that corporations that outlive artists and creators have won legal protections that are hurting everyone else.” Hal Plotkin —Free MickeySF Gate)
Similar:
My 4Cs Story
I chaired a session on Friday, and gave ...
Academia
Why Drag It Out?
The ways that the informal speech of wom...
Culture
Shakespeare did not leave his wife Anne in Stratford, letter fragment suggests
It has long been assumed that William ...
Culture
What is a CRT and Why Don't We Use Them Anymore?
I remember when I started seeing politic...
Aesthetics
I studied philosophy and engineering at university: Here's my verdict on 'job relevant' ed...
She double-majored in engineering and ph...
Academia
Victorian Literature for Accounting Majors
If I can get the English majors in my ne...
Academia


