“The year 2000 marked a turning point, with the population’s ‘momentum’ becoming negative; there will be fewer parents in the next generation than in this one.”
This is a straightforward summary of an article to be published in Science. It might have been a more interesting article if it interviewed someone from one of the overpopulation scare groups. Let’s try a little experiment:
- Google hits on “overpopulation“: “about 121,000. Search took 0.05 seconds”.
- Google hits on “underpopulation“: “about 1,170. Search took 0.11 seconds”.
Hmm… why did it take Google take 100% longer to find 1% of the hits? Is it because the “underpopulation” websites are more obscure? Help me, Elwyn (who, I see, has now broadened his focus from Google in particular to “exercising personal power in the Information Age”).
Similar:
Heard any good stories lately?
My daughter has a terrible time settling...
Books
White House photo access controls public image
Rather than permit photojournalists to s...
Culture
Helvetica Bold Oblique Sweeps Fontys
Helvetica Bold Oblique was the big winne...
Aesthetics
Open Letter from a Millennial: Quit Telling Us We’re Not Special
Even the things we do for fun – playing ...
Business
Spring 2023 Grades: Submitted! (I only had 3 last-minute submissions to mark today.)
Academia
How I Learned What I Learned (featuring Wali Jamal)
Carving out some time to enjoy this show...
Awesome


