In the universal, ritualistic adulation, it was no surprise that Google’s latest service received publicity that was as wide as it was shallow. The blogorrhea and avalanche of e-mail was as if a free, magical cure for cancer had been announced by the National Institutes of Health. I like and use Google a lot, but not with the “nothing-but-Google” zealotry of its fans. —Google Scholar Beta (Review) (Gale Group)
A critical review of Google Scholar. My former student Matt Hoy notes the review is hosted by Thompson Gale (which sells, among other things, online resources, some of which may see Google as competition).
Similar:
Advent of Digital Humanities Will Make English Departments Pointless -- New Republic
Don't overreact to the headline, which i...
Academia
Media Bias Chart version 11, Aug 2023 — Journalism sorted by bias (Left / Center / Right),...
Whether a source is biased towards the l...
Culture
For Two Months, I Got My News From Print Newspapers. Here’s What I Learned.
Farhad Manjoo says he’s a better, more-i...
Culture
80 Days review
80 Days was my go-to game over the summe...
Culture
Play-Doh was Originally Wallpaper Cleaner
The story of Play-Doh began when Kutol, ...
Business
George Stone Credits Scott Adams Adventure Games for Inspiring "Max Headroom"
Scott Adams (creator of "Adventureland,"...
Cyberculture


