It’s an open debate whether the plan to scan millions of books and
make them searchable online will prove the benefit to humanity that
Google promises – or hand it a monopoly over certain digital works, as
opponents allege.But the consensus is the company fomented an avoidable backlash by
forging ahead with its controversial plan without consulting the
parties with the most at stake. Authors and publishers responded with
lawsuits alleging copyright infringement.Google “had the power to do it and so thought ‘why not?’ ” Enderle
said. “That’s the core of how a company goes from being seen as
friendly to being seen as evil.” —SF Gate
Similar:
Southwest Airlines CEO Gary Kelly, who testified unmasked at a Senate hearing on Wednesday...
Kelly testified at the hearing that he b...
Business
Here is an example of how I teach with Inform 7.
Here is an example of how I teach with I...
Academia
For the Cause #StarTrek #DS9 Rewatch (Season 4, Episode 22) Eddington and Odo suspect Sisk...
Rewatching ST:DS9
Sisko and Kassidy pla...
Empathy
The Chronicle of Higher Education Announces Plan to Limit, Curate Comments
By 2016, the terrain has shifted. Public...
Academia
ink: Inkle's open source scripting language for writing interactive narrative
Gearing up to teach "Digital Storytellin...
Cyberculture
The Rise of Curiosity Journalism
Katz and his kindred might just as well ...
Cyberculture


