It’s an open debate whether the plan to scan millions of books and
make them searchable online will prove the benefit to humanity that
Google promises – or hand it a monopoly over certain digital works, as
opponents allege.But the consensus is the company fomented an avoidable backlash by
forging ahead with its controversial plan without consulting the
parties with the most at stake. Authors and publishers responded with
lawsuits alleging copyright infringement.Google “had the power to do it and so thought ‘why not?’ ” Enderle
said. “That’s the core of how a company goes from being seen as
friendly to being seen as evil.” —SF Gate
Similar:
"The face of the last man on Earth." #alquist #rur #robots #capek #virtual #theater Gettin...
Aesthetics
No, this Jeopardy! contestant was not making a white supremacist hand gesture
Conspiracy theories, knee-jerk tribal th...
Current_Events
Google Autocomplete Still Makes Hateful Autocorrect Suggestions
The top suggestion for a Holocaust searc...
Business
Vote for your favorite Monopoly token -- or else!
One of the six current game pieces will ...
Aesthetics
Robot competition requires science, innovation and teamwork
Early tomorrow my son and I will be carp...
Education
New stamp commemorates Irish priest who saved thousands from the Nazis
I recall being very moved by the 1980s G...
Empathy


