It’s an open debate whether the plan to scan millions of books and
make them searchable online will prove the benefit to humanity that
Google promises – or hand it a monopoly over certain digital works, as
opponents allege.But the consensus is the company fomented an avoidable backlash by
forging ahead with its controversial plan without consulting the
parties with the most at stake. Authors and publishers responded with
lawsuits alleging copyright infringement.Google “had the power to do it and so thought ‘why not?’ ” Enderle
said. “That’s the core of how a company goes from being seen as
friendly to being seen as evil.” —SF Gate
Similar:
PAC-MAN: The Untold Story of How We Really Played the Game
A fascinating study of the thinginess of...
Aesthetics
ChatGPT took their jobs. Now they walk dogs and fix air conditioners.
“In every previous automation threat, th...
Business
C.S. Lewis: "On the Reading of Old Books"
Gearing up for teaching a new "American ...
Books
As part of an ongoing feud over the rights to use a particular shade of ultra-black paint,...
As part of an ongoing bid to get his han...
Aesthetics
Birthright, Part 2 (#StarTrek #TNG Rewatch, Season 6, Episode 17) Worf sows disorder in a ...
Rewatching ST:TNG L'Kor tells Worf th...
Ethics
The Declaration of Independence (Dramatic Reading)
I rather enjoyed recording this oral int...
Current_Events


