It’s an open debate whether the plan to scan millions of books and
make them searchable online will prove the benefit to humanity that
Google promises – or hand it a monopoly over certain digital works, as
opponents allege.But the consensus is the company fomented an avoidable backlash by
forging ahead with its controversial plan without consulting the
parties with the most at stake. Authors and publishers responded with
lawsuits alleging copyright infringement.Google “had the power to do it and so thought ‘why not?’ ” Enderle
said. “That’s the core of how a company goes from being seen as
friendly to being seen as evil.” —SF Gate
Similar:
NASA: No, The Eclipse Won't Blind Pets
I once heard a fellow grad student s...
Current_Events
How newsroom managers can invest more time developing their staff — and why it matters
One of my most consistently rewarding pr...
Business
Schieffer: 'We Now Don't Know Where People Get Their News'
The legendary Bob Schieffer is calling i...
Culture
Musician uses computer algorithm to compose every melody possible in C, releases them for ...
A lawyer and hobbyist musician...
Amusing
An alternate universe
My plans to use a Chromebook over the we...
Culture
The Onion's Supreme Court Briefing on Satire Is Stunning
From October:
A man who was arrested ov...
Amusing


