It’s not that hypertext went on to become less interesting than its literary advocates imagined in those early days. Rather, a whole different set of new forms arose in its place: blogs, social networks, crowd-edited encyclopedias. Readers did end up exploring an idea or news event by following links between small blocks of text; it’s just that the blocks of text turned out to be written by different authors, publishing on different sites. Someone tweets a link to a news article, which links to a blog commentary, which links to a Wikipedia entry. Each landing point along that itinerary is a linear piece, designed to be read from start to finish. But the constellation they form is something else. Hypertext turned out to be a brilliant medium for bundling a collection of linear stories or arguments written by different people. —Wired
Why No One Clicked on the Great Hypertext Story
He was abandoned by his flock, his nes...
Empathy
Is higher education ready for the switch...
Academia
I really never paid much attention to Sc...
Aesthetics
Green and Larson both admit that even th...
Aesthetics
On Jan. 27, 1986, the former engineer fo...
Culture
Facebook is discontinuing the “trending”...
Business


