Otero goes into great detail describing her criteria for placing the various news sources. She changed a few labels and shifted position for a few sources. It’s not perfect. It’s not the only answer. It is, nevertheless, a very useful way to get us to think about what we’re clicking on, reading, and sharing.
Update, April 2020: I’ll be honest, I think the interactive Media Bias Chart 5.0 is a bit much… slow to load, and too feature-heavy. I’ve never been patient enough to let it load fully so I can try out whatever makes it interactive.
Here is the static version of Chart 5.1.
Original link on this page: “The Chart, Version 3.0: What, Exactly, Are We Reading?”
See also:
Similar:
Youth Can Check Out Briefcases, Neckties via NYPL Grow Up Work Accessories
The New York Public Library has a progra...
Business
'Most Transparent’ White House In History Keeps Majority Of Trump’s Remarks Secret
On the White House website, there is no ...
Current_Events
My Review of the Charlottesville Tryout of "A Few Good Men" 30 Years Ago
A librarian at the University of Virgini...
Culture
Sweet Lenten Regrets
This Lenten evening / Your orphaned feas...
Aesthetics
“Let It Go,” Idina Menzel’s Frozen ballad: It sends the wrong message.
This author is probably overthinking thi...
Culture
The bots are coming. And they have poems.
Yet in a circle pallid as it f...
Cyberculture







Pingback: Vanessa Otero’s Complex vs. Clickbait, Liberal vs. Conservative Media Chart | Jerz's Literacy Weblog