Otero goes into great detail describing her criteria for placing the various news sources. She changed a few labels and shifted position for a few sources. It’s not perfect. It’s not the only answer. It is, nevertheless, a very useful way to get us to think about what we’re clicking on, reading, and sharing.
Update, April 2020: I’ll be honest, I think the interactive Media Bias Chart 5.0 is a bit much… slow to load, and too feature-heavy. I’ve never been patient enough to let it load fully so I can try out whatever makes it interactive.
Here is the static version of Chart 5.1.
Original link on this page: “The Chart, Version 3.0: What, Exactly, Are We Reading?”
See also:
Similar:
Nichelle Nichols, ground-breaking Star Trek actor and NASA recruiter, 1932-2022
https://twitter.com/CNN/status/15538337...
Current_Events
Google engineers mined the text adventure game "Zork" for AI image prompts
YouTube commenter Bob Hepple writes, "Tw...
Aesthetics
When Perception Trumps Reality: Republicans aren't nearly as rich as Democrats estimate. D...
Democrats wildly over-estimate the perce...
Academia
Crabby 10yo Ties Self to Pole to Protest Injustice
My wife confiscated my preteen daughter'...
Culture
The Great Works of Software
I realized that each one of these techno...
Aesthetics
Okay, a lot of the world is pretty awful right now, but here's an uplifting video about th...
https://youtu.be/umW4koJU3e0
Amusing







Pingback: Vanessa Otero’s Complex vs. Clickbait, Liberal vs. Conservative Media Chart | Jerz's Literacy Weblog