Our understanding of COVID-19 has accreted around the idea that it kills a few and is “mild” for the rest. That caricature was sketched before the new coronavirus even had a name; instead of shifting in the light of fresh data, it calcified. It affected the questions scientists sought to ask, the stories journalists sought to tell, and the patients doctors sought to treat. It excluded long-haulers from help and answers. Nichols’s initial symptoms were so unlike the official description of COVID-19 that her first doctor told her she had acid reflux and refused to get her tested. “Even if you did have COVID-19, you’re 32, you’re healthy, and you’re not going to die,” she remembers him saying. (She has since tested positive.)
As many people still fantasize about returning to their previous lives, some are already staring at a future where that is no longer possible. —The Atlantic
Man Infected with Ebola Misinformation Through Casual Contact With Cable News
Thine Own Self (#StarTrek #TNG Rewatch, Season 7, Episode 16) Data gets amnesia at a RenFe...
Internet hyperlinks do not infringe on copyright, EU court advised
NASA confirms the best-ever evidence for water on Mars
Google engineer put on leave after saying AI chatbot has become sentient
FBI launches flurry of arrests over attacks on journalists during Capitol riot