In real life, people express a given emotion with tremendous variability. In anger, for example, people in urban cultures scowl (or make some of the facial movements for a scowl) only about 35 percent of the time, according to meta-analyses of studies measuring facial movement during emotion. Scowls are also not specific to anger because people scowl for other reasons, such as when they are concentrating or when they have gas. The same tremendous variation occurs for every emotion studied—and for every other measure that purportedly tells us about someone’s emotional state, whether it’s their physiology, voice or brain activity.
Emotion AI systems, therefore, do not detect emotions. They detect physical signals, such as facial muscle movements, not the psychological meaning of those signals. The conflation of movement and meaning is deeply embedded in Western culture and in science. —Scientific American
Darwin Was Wrong: Your Facial Expressions Do Not Reveal Your Emotions
Despite its impressive output, generative AI doesn’t have a coherent understanding of the ...
Will Journalism Be a Crime in a Second Trump Administration?
As part of an ongoing feud over the rights to use a particular shade of ultra-black paint,...
A spooooooky post about predatory journals for this Halloween season.
Our family has seen David Whalen in the persona of Sherlock in five or six different shows...
A young father sold his beloved sports car for “diaper money.” Years later, the man’s son ...