“The year 2000 marked a turning point, with the population’s ‘momentum’ becoming negative; there will be fewer parents in the next generation than in this one.”
This is a straightforward summary of an article to be published in Science. It might have been a more interesting article if it interviewed someone from one of the overpopulation scare groups. Let’s try a little experiment:
- Google hits on “overpopulation“: “about 121,000. Search took 0.05 seconds”.
- Google hits on “underpopulation“: “about 1,170. Search took 0.11 seconds”.
Hmm… why did it take Google take 100% longer to find 1% of the hits? Is it because the “underpopulation” websites are more obscure? Help me, Elwyn (who, I see, has now broadened his focus from Google in particular to “exercising personal power in the Information Age”).
Similar:
Show, Don’t (Just) Tell (New Example)
I wrote down this example on a student p...
Humanities
50 Years Ago: The World in 1961 - Alan Taylor - In Focus - The Atlantic
A fantastic series of photos exploring t...
Aesthetics
What Could Have Been Entering the Public Domain on January 1, 2012?
Current US law extends copyright protect...
Books
Perspective | After Hannity’s travesty, Fox News redeems itself (just a tad) with a bold e...
Fox News was the first major outlet to p...
Culture
Addressing Our Biases: Medieval Bathing
Did medieval people bathe? If you alr...
Culture
In Ferguson, Washington Post reporter Wesley Lowery gives account of his arrest
Comedian Robin Williams and actress Laur...
Culture


