I’ve been scanning the online coverage of the MIT student who caused a bomb scare when she walked into an airport wearing a blinking circuit board on her sweatshirt.
I’m dismayed by the number of headlines that unquestioningly repeat the authorities’ line that she was wearing a “fake bomb.” Several headlines at least put the term in quotation marks, and a good number of them describe the device more neutrally (as a circuit board) or they avoid mentioning the object at all (with a headline that emphasizes that an MIT student caused a bomb scare, but leaving the cause of the scare for the body of the article).
Similar:
Pa. agency explains why it enacted new 'no force-on-force rule' for Bushy Run, other sites
Attending the re-enactment of the Battle...
Culture
11 Tips H.P. Lovecraft Had for Novice Writers
"Avoid reading so as not to taint your c...
Culture
People hate reading instructions, and will only glance at them after they are already frus...
I already bought the thing, and I'm only...
Business
Sondra's Garden: Butterfly Release Honors Dr. Lettrich (Seton Hill University)
"Every good lesson plan has a culminatin...
Academia
Tonight's Supermoon.
Aesthetics
Scrape, Scrape, Spam Blog, Have You Scraped My Site?
http://youtu.be/GFk8hEQ-jNI Below is ...
Books


