It’s an open debate whether the plan to scan millions of books and
make them searchable online will prove the benefit to humanity that
Google promises – or hand it a monopoly over certain digital works, as
opponents allege.But the consensus is the company fomented an avoidable backlash by
forging ahead with its controversial plan without consulting the
parties with the most at stake. Authors and publishers responded with
lawsuits alleging copyright infringement.Google “had the power to do it and so thought ‘why not?’ ” Enderle
said. “That’s the core of how a company goes from being seen as
friendly to being seen as evil.” —SF Gate
Similar:
First They Got Sick, Then They Moved Into a Virtual Utopia
When my son was about five, I sat him on...
Culture
There is no cloud. It's just someone else's computer.
I have so far resisted the jump to strea...
Business
ink: Inkle's open source scripting language for writing interactive narrative
Gearing up to teach "Digital Storytellin...
Cyberculture
Time article with clickbaity headline: Web users annoyed by marketing tricks
This Time magazine article is a good one...
Cyberculture
All the world’s an app
A review of three books -- The App Gener...
Culture
Testing out my new greenscreen
Friendly advice... If you are practicing...
Aesthetics


