Unlike that of most physical and natural scientists, the ability of social scientists to conduct experiments or rely on high-quality data is often limited. In my field, international relations, even the most robust econometric analyses often explain a pathetically small amount of the data’s statistical variance. Indeed, from my first exposure to the philosopher of mathematics Imre Lakatos, I was taught that the goal of social science is falsification. By proving an existing theory wrong, we refine our understanding of what our models can and cannot explain. –Daniel W. Drezner, The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Similar:
Understanding the difference between credible information and propaganda
In the context of my role as a teacher i...
Culture
Woodward dismisses CNN's lawsuit against the White House; Fox sides with CNN
Bob Woodward, half of the Washington Pos...
Culture
National Dance Day
In the restaurant parking lot after dinn...
Culture
The Collaborator (#StarTrek #DS9 Rewatch, Season 2, Episode 24) Winn tasks Kira with inves...
Rewatching ST:DS9 In a vision, Ve...
Empathy
PHD Comics: It's in the syllabus
PHD Comics: It's in the syllab...
Academia
That Uplifting Tweet You Just Shared? A Russian Troll Sent It
Professional disinformation isn’t spread...
Culture
Unlike that of most physical and natural scientists, the ability of social scientists to conduct experiments or rely on high-quality data is often limited. In my field, international relations, even the most robust econometric analyses often explain a pathetically small amount of the data’s statistical variance. Indeed, from my first exposure to the philosopher of mathematics Imre Lakatos, I was taught that the goal of social science is falsification. By proving an existing theory wrong, we refine our understanding of what our models can and cannot explain. –Daniel W. Drezner, 

