Unlike that of most physical and natural scientists, the ability of social scientists to conduct experiments or rely on high-quality data is often limited. In my field, international relations, even the most robust econometric analyses often explain a pathetically small amount of the data’s statistical variance. Indeed, from my first exposure to the philosopher of mathematics Imre Lakatos, I was taught that the goal of social science is falsification. By proving an existing theory wrong, we refine our understanding of what our models can and cannot explain. –Daniel W. Drezner, The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Similar:
Jon Bentley | My Life in Art
Wonderfully weird retro pop art.
Jon re...
Aesthetics
Where Silence Has Lease (TNG Rewatch: Season 2, Episode 2)
Rewatching Star Trek: The Next Generatio...
Culture
Confuse Students to Help Them Learn
Confusing sometimes helps cats, so why n...
Academia
How to Disagree Academically: Using Graham's "Disagreement Hierarchy" to organize a colleg...
How to Disagree Academically: Using Grah...
Academia
31 Undeniable Truths That Journalism Majors Can All Agree On
Because you know you have the chance to ...
Academia
The Story of Rolf and the Viking Bow: Icelandic bromance, with weapons, secret panels, and...
I try to read to my kids for an hour eve...
Books
Unlike that of most physical and natural scientists, the ability of social scientists to conduct experiments or rely on high-quality data is often limited. In my field, international relations, even the most robust econometric analyses often explain a pathetically small amount of the data’s statistical variance. Indeed, from my first exposure to the philosopher of mathematics Imre Lakatos, I was taught that the goal of social science is falsification. By proving an existing theory wrong, we refine our understanding of what our models can and cannot explain. –Daniel W. Drezner, 

