CNN is pretty upfront; three journalists resign after an internal investigation determines a story depending on an anonymous source was posted to the CNN website without undergoing standard checks. In the rush to publish, the editorial structure broke down. (CNN retracted the story before it was aired on cable TV; whatever they can verify will, I’m sure, resurface in another story.) This is NOT an instance of “fake news.” It’s an error in judgement that was caught and dealt with within CNN.
Three CNN journalists, including the executive editor in charge of a new investigative unit, have resigned after the publication of a Russia-related article that was retracted. —CNN
Similar:
Shen Yun Chinese dance troupe
One of seven touring groups devoted to s...
Art
What Could Have Been Entering the Public Domain on January 1, 2012?
Current US law extends copyright protect...
Books
Russia is relying on unwitting Americans to spread election disinformation, US officials s...
If I ever share something that turns out...
Culture
Apple Watch is ugly and boring (and Steve Jobs would have agreed)
I am not feeling the love for Apple's iW...
Aesthetics
We Are the Product Facebook Sells
Facebook does not care what Hobbit you a...
Business
Family Business (#StarTrek #DS9 Rewatch, Season 3, Episode 23) Quark feuds with his mother...
Rewatching ST:DS9 The opening acts re...
Amusing




Well said, Dennis.
Taking the article down and replacing it with an editor’s note was a good idea. Disabling links is a bad move. Should someone have reblogged about it and linked to the original article, anyone who now reads the reblog may never know the original story was redacted.