CNN is pretty upfront; three journalists resign after an internal investigation determines a story depending on an anonymous source was posted to the CNN website without undergoing standard checks. In the rush to publish, the editorial structure broke down. (CNN retracted the story before it was aired on cable TV; whatever they can verify will, I’m sure, resurface in another story.) This is NOT an instance of “fake news.” It’s an error in judgement that was caught and dealt with within CNN.
Three CNN journalists, including the executive editor in charge of a new investigative unit, have resigned after the publication of a Russia-related article that was retracted. —CNN
Similar:
Perspective | How NPR’s Steve Inskeep cracked the code for interviewing Trump
The role of mainstream journalists i...
Current_Events
At the Johnstown Flood Museum. (May 31 1889 the neglected dam at the South Fork Fishing an...
At the Johnstown Flood Museum. (May 31 1...
Culture
Forgive and Remember: How a Good Boss Responds to Mistakes
I'm thinking about risk. When my twee...
Business
Long-Haulers Are Redefining COVID-19
Our understanding of COVID-19 has accret...
Current_Events
How "Hail Mary" Became Inextricably Linked to American Football
I am revamping an existing "News Writing...
Culture
Facebook Announces $300 Million Project, Allegedly to Support Local Journalism
Once upon a time, local newspapers could...
Business




Well said, Dennis.
Taking the article down and replacing it with an editor’s note was a good idea. Disabling links is a bad move. Should someone have reblogged about it and linked to the original article, anyone who now reads the reblog may never know the original story was redacted.