Otero goes into great detail describing her criteria for placing the various news sources. She changed a few labels and shifted position for a few sources. It’s not perfect. It’s not the only answer. It is, nevertheless, a very useful way to get us to think about what we’re clicking on, reading, and sharing.
Update, April 2020: I’ll be honest, I think the interactive Media Bias Chart 5.0 is a bit much… slow to load, and too feature-heavy. I’ve never been patient enough to let it load fully so I can try out whatever makes it interactive.
Here is the static version of Chart 5.1.
Original link on this page: “The Chart, Version 3.0: What, Exactly, Are We Reading?”
See also:
Similar:
What Was the TED Talk?
The title borders on clickbait, but the ...
Culture
NBC's Chuck Todd takes aim at CNN
"The big danger always confronting CNN —...
Business
Each building in my #medievalyork simulation has four levels of detail (so that distant ob...
Aesthetics
Defiant (#StarTrek #DS9 Rewatch, Season 3, Episode 9) Riker visits DS9, and it's he who's ...
Rewatching ST:DS9 After an overworked...
Empathy
The Hidden Signs That Can Reveal a Fake Photo
Farid emphasises that forensic techniq...
Cyberculture
Churning Out More Non-profit Arts Promos
As part of my volunteer work for a local...
Aesthetics







Pingback: Vanessa Otero’s Complex vs. Clickbait, Liberal vs. Conservative Media Chart | Jerz's Literacy Weblog