Otero goes into great detail describing her criteria for placing the various news sources. She changed a few labels and shifted position for a few sources. It’s not perfect. It’s not the only answer. It is, nevertheless, a very useful way to get us to think about what we’re clicking on, reading, and sharing.
Update, April 2020: I’ll be honest, I think the interactive Media Bias Chart 5.0 is a bit much… slow to load, and too feature-heavy. I’ve never been patient enough to let it load fully so I can try out whatever makes it interactive.
Here is the static version of Chart 5.1.
Original link on this page: “The Chart, Version 3.0: What, Exactly, Are We Reading?”
See also:
Similar:
NASA's Perseverance lander brought some Easter eggs with it to Mars
It's a bit of a stretch to call this Ted...
Awesome
It's been a Dwarf Fortress afternoon.
Awesome
SHU Community Lines Up to Honor JoAnne Boyle's Final Trip Up the Hill
JoAnne Boyle liked talking about traditi...
Academia
In December 1999, I Was Blogging About Joseph Heller, E-Journalism, and Travel Writing
In December 1999, I was blogging about:
...
Business
Liberal Arts Majors Are the Future of the Tech Industry
My sister the computer programmer benefi...
Academia
The woman and the car: a chatty little handbook for all women who motor or want to motor (...
Great piece of history, from 1909. Dorot...
Amusing







Pingback: Vanessa Otero’s Complex vs. Clickbait, Liberal vs. Conservative Media Chart | Jerz's Literacy Weblog