It’s an open debate whether the plan to scan millions of books and
make them searchable online will prove the benefit to humanity that
Google promises – or hand it a monopoly over certain digital works, as
opponents allege.But the consensus is the company fomented an avoidable backlash by
forging ahead with its controversial plan without consulting the
parties with the most at stake. Authors and publishers responded with
lawsuits alleging copyright infringement.Google “had the power to do it and so thought ‘why not?’ ” Enderle
said. “That’s the core of how a company goes from being seen as
friendly to being seen as evil.” —SF Gate
Similar:
Associate Dean of What?
The idea of students as customers relies...
Academia
Snap's share price sinks, trades just above IPO price
NASDAQ.com throws shade via Reuters:
Sn...
Business
‘Snowplow parents’ may be trapping their children
The passing agonies of the everyday are ...
Culture
Masks serve many purposes. How sad that they’ve become politicized.
I've seen the original meme on my so...
Current_Events
Police, citizens and technology factor into Boston bombing probe
In addition to being almost universally ...
Current_Events
Introduction to Twine (Tutorials by Vegetarian Zombie)
I will always love Inform 7, but I c...
Academia


