It’s an open debate whether the plan to scan millions of books and
make them searchable online will prove the benefit to humanity that
Google promises – or hand it a monopoly over certain digital works, as
opponents allege.But the consensus is the company fomented an avoidable backlash by
forging ahead with its controversial plan without consulting the
parties with the most at stake. Authors and publishers responded with
lawsuits alleging copyright infringement.Google “had the power to do it and so thought ‘why not?’ ” Enderle
said. “That’s the core of how a company goes from being seen as
friendly to being seen as evil.” —SF Gate
Similar:
The Period, Our Simplest Punctuation Mark, Has Become a Sign of Anger
You text your girlfriend: “I know we mad...
Cyberculture
Revisiting a Website I Created in 1996: Engineering Writing Centre (University of Toronto)
During the Christmas break of 1996, when...
Aesthetics
Real or Fake? (News Game)
Real or fake? At a time when the reading...
Ethics
This Woman Inspired One of the First Hit Video Games by Mapping the World’s Longest Cave
The Medium headline calls Colossal Cave ...
Academia
Remember Who The Enemy Is
Good article on Catching Fire. (I haven'...
Books
Facebook Hired Journalists to Train Its Trending Topics Algorithm
Recently I noticed an unusually incendia...
Business


