Then the researchers handed over the instructions and taught the PCs a “machine-learning system so it could use a player’s manual to guide the development of a game-playing strategy.” They didn’t teach the PC how to play Civ, but they taught them how to read about it. The system had no pre-programmed notion of turn-based strategy or even what the objects in the world represented. The system was a noob.
The AI continued to button-mash but, this time around, when words appeared on-screen the software compared them to text in the manual. It searched for other related words close-by and tried to guess what it all meant. The computer started “reading” the manual and impementing tactics in-game, just like we used to before the days of streamlined tutorials. Its win ratio was boosted from 46 per cent to a reasonable 79. —PC AI sucks at Civilization, reads manual, starts kicking ass | PC Gamer.
PC AI sucks at Civilization, reads manual, starts kicking ass | PC Gamer
The New Mexico landfill or "Atari Dump" ...
Amusing
Latest weapon against junk e-mail: poetr...
Cyberculture
Verrit, like Snopes, Politifact, and a h...
Culture
I keep a silly personal blog devoted to ...
Personal
I am working on some conference papers t...
Culture
I can't stand Pinterest. I hate when G...
Business


