Then the researchers handed over the instructions and taught the PCs a “machine-learning system so it could use a player’s manual to guide the development of a game-playing strategy.” They didn’t teach the PC how to play Civ, but they taught them how to read about it. The system had no pre-programmed notion of turn-based strategy or even what the objects in the world represented. The system was a noob.
The AI continued to button-mash but, this time around, when words appeared on-screen the software compared them to text in the manual. It searched for other related words close-by and tried to guess what it all meant. The computer started “reading” the manual and impementing tactics in-game, just like we used to before the days of streamlined tutorials. Its win ratio was boosted from 46 per cent to a reasonable 79. —PC AI sucks at Civilization, reads manual, starts kicking ass | PC Gamer.
PC AI sucks at Civilization, reads manual, starts kicking ass | PC Gamer
Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers
Chess with my son. As usual, it didn't go well for me.
First-Gen Social Media Users Have Nowhere to Go
The Supreme Court could soon change the internet forever — here’s what you need to know
Why is Elon Musk attacking Wikipedia? Because its very existence offends him
How to fix the internet: If we want online discourse to improve, we need to move beyond th...