It’s not surprising that marketers love IntelliTxt while many journalists despise it. AlwaysOn columnist Rafe Needleman called IntelliTxt “pretty bad news” from an ethics standpoint “because it blurs the line between editorial content, which readers should expect to be free of commercial influence, and advertising, which we know is paid-for and biased.” —Adam L. Penenberg —This Headline Is Not for Sale (Wired)
The “IntelliTxt” ad service inserts inline links into the body of a news article. I’d agree that this oversteps a line, potentially blurring what should be a pretty clear boundary between editorial content and paid advertising.
Similar:
Think Like A Journalist | Kelsey Samuels | TEDxPlano
Culture
Preparing for some serious nerd time with the family this summer
Set phasers to "nerd"! This summer I'll...
Culture
Highlighters and Intellectual Growth in College
Tucked away in this article on how to av...
Academia
Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore. Even in English Class.
Twelfth-grade reading scores are a...
Books
Texas School Censors All Of ‘Huck Finn’ Except The N-Words (Satire from The Onion)
Is it only a matter of time until this p...
Books
What does a professor do, other than lecture for a few hours a week?
Wow, this response! 😮 We really do hav...
Academia
Chuck, I don’t think Intelltxt is something that’s downloaded on your computer so it affects every page you view, but I can imagine sneakware that does something like that.
Actually, I just read the article more carefully, and my situation was something different because I wasn’t creating the links. But this is certainly inappropraitely blurring a boundary between advertising and editorial content.
I *think* my office computer was hit by something like IntelliTxt. I’d go to my blog and certain keywords (a movie title, the word “travel”) were highlighted with links to a movie website or a travel agent website. Very annoying and frightening.