To summarize the findings: because they didn’t teach to the test, the professors who instilled the deepest learning in their students came out looking the worst in terms of student evaluations and initial exam performance. To me, these results were staggering, and I don’t say that lightly.
Bottom line? Student evaluations are of questionable value.
Teachers spend a lot of effort and time on making sure their lectures are polished and clear. That’s probably a good thing, if it inspires students to pay attention, come to class, and stay motivated. But it’s also important to keep the goal–learning–in sight. In fact, some argue that students need to fail a lot more if they want to learn. —Psychology Today.
Similar:
What have my students learned about creative nonfiction writing? During class they are col...
There’s No Longer Any Doubt That Hollywood Writing Is Powering AI
Sesame Street had a big plot twist in November 1986
I played hooky from work to see Wild Robot with my family
I’ve been teaching with this handout for over 25 years, updating it regularly. I just remo...
Sorry, not sorry. I don't want such friends.
Elaine Vaudreuil liked this on Facebook.
Lou Recine Ofs liked this on Facebook.
RT @DennisJerz: Do the Best Professors Get the Worst Ratings? (Psychology Today) http://t.co/gi095lErZq
RT @DennisJerz: Do the Best Professors Get the Worst Ratings? (Psychology Today) http://t.co/gi095lErZq
Stacy Ann Vitt liked this on Facebook.