“I don’t see why we are fixated on the single category of income as a measure of success,” James R. Grossman, executive director of the American Historical Association, wrote in an email to The Chronicle. “If humanities majors tend to become teachers, social workers, clergy, does that mean they are less successful than money managers or engineers?
“Instead of assuming these humanities majors are less successful, we ought to be thanking them for being willing to make financial sacrifices in their careers to provide our communities with essential resources,” he wrote. —The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Similar:
At Computers and Writing #cwcon for the weekend.
Am I wise now? At an event for encouragi...
Academia
Mariah Carey meets William Carlos Williams
Amusing
Educators approve national campaign to halt high stakes, “toxic tests”
Not a news item, but an announcement fro...
Culture
Tribunal (#StarTrek #DS9 Rewatch, Season 2, Episode 25) O'Brien Must Suffer: shore leave i...
Rewatching ST:DS9 O'Brien annoys ...
Justice
US regulators demand clamp down on Apple e-book contracts
I made a lot of impulse Kindle purchases...
Books
College Instructors Don't Require Enough Writing
I was surprised a few years ago to learn...
Academia




Jamie Fornsaglio Hull liked this on Facebook.
Karissa Kilgore liked this on Facebook.
I don’t know anyone who sees income as the “single category” of value. But it matters. One also can have a vocation to be financially solvent, to support a family, and to explore new ways of being a humanist in the world.