This sounds a lot like wishful thinking, but there’s plenty to learn from well-articulated alternate opinions.
What if, in the mad dash two decades ago to repurpose and extend editorial content onto the Web, editors and publishers made a colossal business blunder that wasted hundreds of millions of dollars? What if the industry should have stuck with its strengths—the print editions where the vast majority of their readers still reside and where the overwhelming majority of advertising and subscription revenue come from—instead of chasing the online chimera? —Politico
Similar:
You didn’t make the Harlem Shake go viral—corporations did
I never found "Harlem Shake" videos to b...
Business
Choose wisely... you have the power to turn this wrap into a sandwich or a candy bar... or...
Aesthetics
The false link between Amy Coney Barrett and The Handmaid’s Tale, explained
One of the weirder ways this debate has ...
Books
Story Pitch: How writers present an article idea to a busy editor
I hoped this slide would appeal to m...
Amusing
Why are sports in trouble in the U.S.? Because we didn’t do the work.
Hard-hitting column from Sally Jen...
Business
A Colorado town's newspapers were stolen after a story about rape charges at the police ch...
I'm sure the good-apple cops will fairly...
Ethics


