CNN is pretty upfront; three journalists resign after an internal investigation determines a story depending on an anonymous source was posted to the CNN website without undergoing standard checks. In the rush to publish, the editorial structure broke down. (CNN retracted the story before it was aired on cable TV; whatever they can verify will, I’m sure, resurface in another story.) This is NOT an instance of “fake news.” It’s an error in judgement that was caught and dealt with within CNN.
Three CNN journalists, including the executive editor in charge of a new investigative unit, have resigned after the publication of a Russia-related article that was retracted. —CNN
Similar:
In December 2001 I was blogging about
In December 2001, I was blogging about
...
Amusing
My journalism students just gave me this wristband: "What would Jerz do? / Verify or duck....
Aesthetics
There are more museums in the US than there are Starbucks and McDonalds – combined
I have no particular problem with the pl...
Business
Among today’s major professional accomplishments: installing this hook. #springbreak
My office door feels more complete now.
...
Academia
Leonard Nimoy, Spock of ‘Star Trek,’ Dies at 83
Leonard Nimoy, the sonorous, gaunt-faced...
Current_Events
In an Unpredictable Job Market, How Should People Think About College Majors?
I tell my students that if what they wan...
Academia




Well said, Dennis.
Taking the article down and replacing it with an editor’s note was a good idea. Disabling links is a bad move. Should someone have reblogged about it and linked to the original article, anyone who now reads the reblog may never know the original story was redacted.