CNN is pretty upfront; three journalists resign after an internal investigation determines a story depending on an anonymous source was posted to the CNN website without undergoing standard checks. In the rush to publish, the editorial structure broke down. (CNN retracted the story before it was aired on cable TV; whatever they can verify will, I’m sure, resurface in another story.) This is NOT an instance of “fake news.” It’s an error in judgement that was caught and dealt with within CNN.
Three CNN journalists, including the executive editor in charge of a new investigative unit, have resigned after the publication of a Russia-related article that was retracted. —CNN
Similar:
Vote for your favorite Monopoly token -- or else!
One of the six current game pieces will ...
Aesthetics
Witness Accounts in Midtown Hammer Attack Show the Power of False Memory
Two people who saw a police encounte...
Current_Events
Portofess
"If people can confess on Oprah, Phil an...
Ethics
It’s alive! What NPR learned from turning its @nprnews Twitter account from a bot into a h...
My student journalists tell me they lear...
Cyberculture
Out & About: Stage Right holds its annual Heart of the Arts Gala
Source: Out & About: Stage Right...
Culture
The Measure of a Man (ST:TNG Rewatch, Season 2, Episode 9)
Rewatching ST:TNG after a 20-year break....
Culture




Well said, Dennis.
Taking the article down and replacing it with an editor’s note was a good idea. Disabling links is a bad move. Should someone have reblogged about it and linked to the original article, anyone who now reads the reblog may never know the original story was redacted.