CNN is pretty upfront; three journalists resign after an internal investigation determines a story depending on an anonymous source was posted to the CNN website without undergoing standard checks. In the rush to publish, the editorial structure broke down. (CNN retracted the story before it was aired on cable TV; whatever they can verify will, I’m sure, resurface in another story.) This is NOT an instance of “fake news.” It’s an error in judgement that was caught and dealt with within CNN.
Three CNN journalists, including the executive editor in charge of a new investigative unit, have resigned after the publication of a Russia-related article that was retracted. —CNN
Similar:
Journalists should not amplify the ableist biases of untrained sources
Being a cop, lawyer, patriot, protestor,...
Culture
Benedict XVI (Pontifex) on Twitter
John Paul II was a master of communicati...
Current_Events
Telegrams were always better plot devices than USPS letters
I can't summon up actual nostalgia for t...
Business
If You’re An English Major You Should Take a Journalism Class–Even If You Think You Hate J...
Journalism is not everyone’s cup of tea....
Academia
Dan Rather, who knows a thing or two about fake news, shares tips for news consumers
"If you find yourself agreeing with ever...
Culture
Editors and editorial board quit top linguistics journal to protest subscription fees
When I publish as a scholar, my goal is ...
Academia




Well said, Dennis.
Taking the article down and replacing it with an editor’s note was a good idea. Disabling links is a bad move. Should someone have reblogged about it and linked to the original article, anyone who now reads the reblog may never know the original story was redacted.