I tend to defend journalism when showboaters & slogan-quoters attack “the media” in general, but I’m eager to read legitimate critiques of individual news stories. Here’s one that seems to manipulate data out of context to support a fearmongering narrative. (Don’t do this!)

1. Data not normalized
2. Not the appropriate visualization
3. No differentiation between data and projections
4. Not the whole story
5. No contextualization of riskAnd NOT a @nytimes staffer; should be clear in byline, not small print at the bottomhttps://t.co/GqrKYcDg5t
— 🏳️🌈 Kathy E Gill 😷 🇺🇦mastodon.social/@kegill (@kegill) September 22, 2021
Similar:
What Twitter Changes Might Mean for Academics
This is one of the reasons I still consi...
Academia
NYT: G.W. Bush is "super-overexposed" and "so far to our right" -- so they omitted his pre...
The quotes in my headline are accurate, ...
Amusing
A Video Game About Changing What Happens In Shakespeare's Hamlet
Elsinore is a game where you play as Oph...
Culture
Another section of #steampunk control panel, because reasons. #blender3d #blender3dart
One of many steampunk control panels I'v...
Aesthetics
Readers Are Liars: The 1928 Study That Predicted the Future of News
The invention of the telegraph and the s...
Business
Adding details to a clip-art silhouette, for a project that will be released in a day or t...
An important but small detail in a B...
Aesthetics


