We rail against sequels, we talk about how we want original titles, but–according to the indisputable sales data–continue to lap up unimaginative, derivative sequel after unimaginative, derivative sequel.
Is it any wonder, then, that companies continue to crank out sequel after roster update after sequel? They’re financially rewarded for doing so! —Vladimir Cole —The folly of rewarding A while wishing for B (Joystiq)
Similar:
Facebook’s Instant Articles restore subscription options they previously stripped
The ability to serve content faster than...
Business
15 more sites that forbid you from linking to them » Malcolm Coles
Some people don't seem to get it.
Here,...
Cyberculture
Student Newspapers Scurry to Make Ends Meet
“After 112 years as The Daily Emerald, t...
Academia
I can't really articulate why i enjoy crafting #steampunk control panels, but it's been a ...
Aesthetics
What a stunningly responsible young man I was, to have on June 10 1998 backed up all my fi...
Cyberculture
Kairos: Open Since 1996
As a plucky new faculty member I wrote a...
Academia


