Nogroski presented his results before the entire fifth-grade science community Monday, in partial fulfillment of his seventh-period research project. According to the review panel, which convened in the lunchroom Tuesday, “Otters” was fundamentally flawed by Nogroski’s failure to identify a significant research gap.
“When Mike said, ‘Otters,’ I almost puked,” said 11-year-old peer examiner Lacey Swain, taking the lettuce out of her sandwich. “Why would you want to spend a whole page talking about otters?” —Fifth-Grade Science Paper Doesn’t Stand Up To Peer Review (The Onion (satire; will expire))
Thanks for the suggestion, Will.
Similar:
Yesterday my stack of unmarked assignments was about 120, so this is not bad.
How to Disagree Academically: Using Graham's "Disagreement Hierarchy" to organize a colleg...
Dr. David von Schlichten honors the spectrum of motivations (not always financial) feature...
Journalist flexes in story about Trump Media accountant who has spelled his own name 14 di...
NASA reconnects with Voyager 1 (after months of confusion)
Collegewide game encourages small interactions around campus