I tend to defend journalism when showboaters & slogan-quoters attack “the media” in general, but I’m eager to read legitimate critiques of individual news stories. Here’s one that seems to manipulate data out of context to support a fearmongering narrative. (Don’t do this!)

1. Data not normalized
2. Not the appropriate visualization
3. No differentiation between data and projections
4. Not the whole story
5. No contextualization of riskAnd NOT a @nytimes staffer; should be clear in byline, not small print at the bottomhttps://t.co/GqrKYcDg5t
— 🏳️🌈 Kathy E Gill 😷 🇺🇦mastodon.social/@kegill (@kegill) September 22, 2021
Similar:
Personality Profiles: Prize-Winning Student Journalism Samples
The personality profile is a staple of i...
Culture
Source: Wenner Declined Resignation from Rolling Stone Deputy Editor
According to a source inside Rolling Sto...
Current_Events
Mr. Chen Goes to Wuhan
A Chinese media personality with over ha...
Culture
Post-publication review as an efficient alternative to pre-publication peer review
Andrew Gelman of "Statistical Modeling, ...
Academia
Advice to a recent journalism graduate
* The best stories are the ones you find...
Ethics
A spooooooky post about predatory journals for this Halloween season.
Predatory publications are not concerned...
Academia


