I’ve been scanning the online coverage of the MIT student who caused a bomb scare when she walked into an airport wearing a blinking circuit board on her sweatshirt.
I’m dismayed by the number of headlines that unquestioningly repeat the authorities’ line that she was wearing a “fake bomb.” Several headlines at least put the term in quotation marks, and a good number of them describe the device more neutrally (as a circuit board) or they avoid mentioning the object at all (with a headline that emphasizes that an MIT student caused a bomb scare, but leaving the cause of the scare for the body of the article).
Similar:
A.I. Is Getting More Powerful, but Its Hallucinations Are Getting Worse
The newest and most powerful technolog...
Business
So Long Blogging. Hello—Yep, We're Going to Say It—Plogging
I still blog, because I want control ove...
Business
Google Autocomplete Still Makes Hateful Autocorrect Suggestions
The top suggestion for a Holocaust searc...
Business
Death to high school English
"There’s such an emphasis on keeping stu...
Academia
The Drinks are On Us! and Us! and Us Too!
I got a text message a couple days ago.....
Culture
New data on the first three jobs held by graduates of six popular majors
“There is an enormous part of the econom...
Academia


