In all media that boasts your byline remain impartial, and don’t do
anything stupid. But is it in the best interests of the paper? Washington Post ombudsman Andrew Alexander points out the the Post
(along with just about every other mainstream publication) has at times
come under fire for being partisan. These guidelines aim to cut off
those accusations before they can be made (and already senior post
editor Raju Narisetti has closed his account).
But in this age of self-branded journalists, where power and readership loyalty is often the result of an audience’s personal connection with the writer is it really a good idea to remove all evidence of personality from the reporter’s product? –Glynnis MacNicol
If Google+ Heads to the Grave, at Least It’ll Have Direction
Do Cultural Critics Have Any Value Left?
Telegrams were always better plot devices than USPS letters
When is the phrase "when asked about..." part of good news writing? Rarely.
Donald Trump's chilling escalation of his war with the media
Let Me Explain Why Miley Cyrus’ VMA Performance Was Our Top Story This Morning