Kairos uses a three-stage review process. First, editors decide if a submission makes sense for a review. Then, the entire editorial board discusses the submission (online) for two weeks, and reaches a consensus that is communicated to the author with detailed letters from the board. (Board members’ identities are public, so there is no secrecy about who reviews pieces.) Then, if appropriate, someone is assigned to work with the author to coach him or her on how to improve the piece prior to publication.
As Ball described the process, thousands of words are written about submissions, and lengthy discussions take place — all to figure out the best content for the journal. But there are no secret reviewers, and the coaching process allows for a collaborative effort to prepare a final version, not someone guessing about how to handle a “revise and resubmit” letter. —Humanities scholars consider the role of peer review | Inside Higher Ed.
Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers
MLA in-text citations: avoid these common errors
A big day for our first year writing students! So much energy in the room!
My Shakespeare students are off peer reviewing their term paper rough drafts. I’m official...
First-Gen Social Media Users Have Nowhere to Go
Burgh to Burg, episode 2.