In one version of Hawking’s eulogistic story, we praise the smartest person in the world, the brilliant physicist, one of the greatest cosmologists of our time. He fits perfectly well with our conception of how science and its heroes work: To be a genius all one needs is a powerful – a “beautiful” – mind. And indeed, because of his disability, Hawking embodies the mythical figure capable of grasping the ultimate laws of the universe with nothing but the sheer strength of his reasoning: He can’t move his body, so everything must be in his mind. What else would a theoretical physicist need?
But in another version of Hawking’s story, we notice that he is more “incorporated” than any other scientist, let alone human being. He is delegated across numerous other bodies: technicians, students, assistants, and of course, machines. Hawking’s “genius,” far from being the product of his mind alone, is in fact profoundly located, material, and collective in nature.
via Wired.com.
On Stephen Hawking, Vader and Being More Machine Than Human
The Toulmin model for analyzing arguments came up at a faculty pedagogy workshop today. I ...
Time lapse movie shows exoplanets orbiting star HR8799, 133 light years away. (Published i...
Opinion | Alec Baldwin Didn’t Have to Talk to the Police. Neither Do You.
Mindset matters. Sometimes it's an accomplishment just to make it through the day. But we ...
Academics work to detect ChatGPT and other AI writing
Brought my in-progress #blender3d project into the #unity3d gaming engine. Plenty of frust...