The karyotype of Pimelodella cristata (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae) from Central Amazon basin: with a discussion of the chromosome variability in Pimelodella I, as the Editor (i.e. no as the Author of the Article) can confirm that it is OK to proceed; you have, however, to get also the reply from the Author; thank you. Nevertheless, Figures 1-3 should be somehow inserted within the main text of the paper. And I do not know why my reply is automatically directed to Frank Franco…?

/ 29 Mar 2022

Some scholarly journals have a more rigorous peer review process than others.

Source: The karyotype of Pimelodella cristata (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae) from Central Amazon basin: with a discussion of the chromosome variability in Pimelodella I, as the Editor (i.e. no as the Author of the Article) can confirm that it is OK to proceed; you have, however, to get also the reply from the Author; thank you. Nevertheless, Figures 1-3 should be somehow inserted within the main text of the paper. And I do not know why my reply is automatically directed to Frank Franco…?

Update:

The page has been edited. Nobody’s perfect. I’ve made mistakes, too, and so have you. Moving on.

 

Similar:

Why I disagreed with my students who said, "That was easy!"
Thank you, frog and friends, for reminding us all what the Internet is supposed to be for.
What can you do with an English Major?
Credible case that a lost Shakespeare sonnet has been identified
There are two factions working to prevent AI dangers. Here’s why they’re deeply divided.
False equivalency in a copspeak guide to dealing with the media