And as far as I know, no other news outlet in the world got this point wrong except the BBC — not even the tabloids.
People often accuse the BBC of agenda-driven falsification of stories. Perhaps that’s sometimes true, I don’t know. But in the cases of science mis-reporting that I’m familiar with — and there are many of them — the problem seems to be that the reporters and editors concerned are arrogant, lazy, and not very smart.
[…]
Perhaps the BBC News stories in question are turned out by low-level employees who are given only a few minutes to re-write each press release, and are strictly prohibited from doing any independent research, even as much as might be accomplished in a half an hour of web research, or a brief interview with an expert. If so, then all the blame belongs to the managers who have thus condemned their writers to produce drivel. —Mark Liberman —They Just Don’t Care (Language Log)
They Just Don't Care
Each building in my #medievalyork simulation has four levels of detail (so that distant ob...
What have my students learned about creative nonfiction writing? During class they are col...
There’s No Longer Any Doubt That Hollywood Writing Is Powering AI
Sesame Street had a big plot twist in November 1986
I’ve been teaching with this handout for over 25 years, updating it regularly. I just remo...
Despite its impressive output, generative AI doesn’t have a coherent understanding of the ...