When you think about it, the Times may have it backward. It charges $1 for the latest news in print, and offers it free over the Web, but for old material demands $3, which is three times the price of an entire newspaper. —Adam L. Penenberg —Searching for the New York Times (Wired)
The NY Times is a great paper, but you have to register to read articles, and they quickly dissapear into paid archives. So it’s not making a dent online. There are ways to get around it, but I haven’t found it worth the trouble. It’s also possible to get Salon articles for free (if you sit through a long commercial), but there’s plenty of other good stuff online that will be less annoying to read.
Similar:
Support the arts in your community! I’m here for the daughter and the rest of the cast. @j...
Support the arts in your community! I’m ...
Culture
Kids Rarely Read Whole Books Anymore. Even in English Class.
Twelfth-grade reading scores are a...
Books
Video Game about Cancer and Grief
On my list for the next time I teach "Vi...
Aesthetics
Identity Crisis (#StarTrek #TNG Rewatch, Season 4 Episode 18) The Case of LaForge’s Disapp...
Rewatching ST:TNG An enjoyable ...
Media
We Had No Idea What Alexander Graham Bell Sounded Like. Until Now | History & Archaeology
"Hear my voice. Alexander Graham Bell." ...
Culture
NPR quits Twitter after being falsely labeled as 'state-affiliated media'
NPR will no longer post fresh content to...
Business



I love this. So true! Can’t believe I never thought of it this way. The $ is tied to the archive, not the breaking news…the past has become the treasure chest of the media, not the present.