In all media that boasts your byline remain impartial, and don’t do
anything stupid. But is it in the best interests of the paper? Washington Post ombudsman Andrew Alexander points out the the Post
(along with just about every other mainstream publication) has at times
come under fire for being partisan. These guidelines aim to cut off
those accusations before they can be made (and already senior post
editor Raju Narisetti has closed his account).
But in this age of self-branded journalists, where power and readership loyalty is often the result of an audience’s personal connection with the writer is it really a good idea to remove all evidence of personality from the reporter’s product? –Glynnis MacNicol
Similar:
How to Disagree Academically: Using Graham's "Disagreement Hierarchy" to organize a colleg...
A.I. 'Completes' Keith Haring's Intentionally Unfinished Painting
“The Cowherd Who Became a Poet,” by James Baldwin. (Read by Dennis Jerz)
Journalist flexes in story about Trump Media accountant who has spelled his own name 14 di...
NASA reconnects with Voyager 1 (after months of confusion)
This is what the techbros are excited about? Really?